Decision 0830E – South San Francisco Unified School District
Decision Date: July 26, 1990
Decision Type: PERB Decision
Perc Vol: 14
Perc Index: 21151
1502.01000 – In General
The Board has no authority in unfair practice proceeding to render decision concerning an alleged violation of the pubic notice requirements. Public notice complaints must be filed in accordance with the regulations governing them (PERB Regulations 32900 - 32960); p. 3. While Board may be without authority to find violation of EERA section 3547(d) in unfair practice proceedings, the Board may consider compliance with public notice requirements to be a factor which may be considered in evaluating whether party has been acting in good faith during the negotiations process. Here, the District failed to specifically allege that failure to comply with public notice requirements constituted a failure to participate in good faith in impasse procedures; pp. 3-4. impasse procedures; pp. 3-4.
1107.01000 – Exceptions; Responses to Exceptions; Standing; Extensions of Time/Late Filing/Waiver
Unless good cause is shown, a charging party may not present on appeal of a dismissal new charge allegations or new supporting evidence; pp. 4-6.
1503.02000 – Regulations Considered (By Number)
32635(b) - Unless good cause is shown, a charging party may not present on appeal of a dismisal new charge allegations or new supporting evidence; pp. 4-6.